Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania

Received: 10 October 2026     Accepted: 26 October 2026     Published: 31 October 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Iraqw is a Southern Cushitic language spoken in northern Tanzania. Previous studies have described some aspects of Iraqw phonology, but more information is needed about the consonantal changes that occur in the language and the conditions under which they take place. This study examined lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw, with the aim of identifying the processes, describing their conditioning environments, and explaining how they operate at the lexical level. The study used a qualitative design to analyse Iraqw consonantal phonological processes. Data were collected through elicitation, documentary sources, and focus group discussions with twelve native Iraqw speakers aged 50-80 from Loto and Bermi villages in Dareda Ward, Babati Rural District, Manyara Region, Tanzania. The analysis was guided by Lexical Phonology and Distinctive Feature Theory. The data were analysed by examining consonant changes and the linguistic environments in which they occur. Phonological rules were then formulated using the underlying representation (UR), lexical representation (LR), and phonetic representation (PR) model. The rules followed the format A → B / C __ D. The findings identified four (4) lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw: consonant deletion, voicing, fortition, and glide formation. The processes occur in different phonological and morphological environments. For example, voicing occurs in plural formation, where the voiceless consonant /t/ changes to the voiced consonant [d]. These findings show that consonant changes in Iraqw follow identifiable patterns that can be explained through phonological rules. The study concludes that the identified processes help explain how consonants behave in different linguistic environments in Iraqw. It recommends that the findings be used in preparing Iraqw language teaching materials, dictionaries, and orthographic guidelines. It also calls for greater government and institutional support for documenting indigenous languages, promoting their use in education, and preserving them for future generations.

Published in Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11
Page(s) 102-121
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Iraqw, Consonantal Phonological Processes, Lexical Phonology, Segmental Phonology

References
[1] Aliero, M. A. (2015). Morphophonological processes of the C'lela noun. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, *4*(1), 1–14.
[2] Alonso Déniz, A. (2024). Fortition. In G. K. Giannakis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics online. Brill.
[3] Alphonce, S. (2022). The structure of the Iraqw noun phrase [Master's thesis, University of Dar es Salaam].
[4] Bayo, P. B., Alphonce, C., & Magashi, S. (2024). Analysis of the current status of Iraqw kinship terms to foresee their future trends. Cogent Arts & Humanities, *11*(1), Article 2408862.
[5] Berger, P., & Kießling, R. (1998). Iraqw texts. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
[6] Berowa, J., & Flores, R. (2021). Phonological processes in Philippine English. Journal of English Linguistics, *49*(2), 145–162.
[7] Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press.
[8] Booij, G., & Rubach, J. (1987). Postlexical rules in lexical phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, *18*(1), 1–44.
[9] Chabot, A. (2023). Prosodic strength in Campidanese Sardinian as substance-free phonology. Phonology, *40*(3–4), 197–228.
[10] Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row.
[11] Choti, J. N. (2025). Nasal prefix segmental processes. In L. Marten, E. Hurst-Harosh, N. C. Kula, & J. Zeller (Eds.), The Oxford guide to the Bantu languages (pp. 513–525). Oxford University Press.
[12] Chung, C. (2024). An aspect of vowel hiatus resolution in the English word formation process. (Language Research), *72*, 49–71.
[13] Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, *2*, 225–252.
[14] Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. Longman.
[15] Ehret, C. (1980). The historical reconstruction of Southern Cushitic phonology and vocabulary. Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
[16] Ehret, C. (1991). The classification of Cushitic. In A. S. Kaye (Ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa (Vol. 2, pp. 321–346). Eisenbrauns.
[17] Ekiugbo, P. O. (2024, November 20). Rethinking the interaction between glide formation and vowel elision in Edoid languages [Workshop presentation]. Atelier de Phonologie, CNRS, Paris, France.
[18] Ethnologue. (2024). Iraqw. In D. M. Eberhard, G. F. Simons, & C. D. Fennig (Eds.), Ethnologue: Languages of the world (27th ed.). SIL International.
[19] Garoma, G. (2012). Phonological processes in Oromo [Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University].
[20] Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
[21] Halle, M., & Mohanan, K. P. (1985). Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry, *16*(1), 57–116.
[22] Harlow, R. (2016). Swahili: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
[23] Harvey, A. (2014). Consonantal weakening in Cushitic [Doctoral dissertation, University of London].
[24] Harvey, A. (2019). Gorwaa (Tanzania) – Language contexts. Language Documentation and Description, *16*, 127–168.
[25] Harvey, A., & Mreta, A. B. (2016). The Gorwaa noun: Toward a description of Southern Cushitic noun morphology. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, *37*(2), 223–261.
[26] Hokororo, A. D. (2018). Phonological and morphological processes in Ci-Bena and Ki-Hehe: A comparative study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam].
[27] Hyman, L. M. (1975). Phonology: Theory and analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[28] Hyman, L. M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Foris Publications.
[29] Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala University.
[30] Jakobson, R. (1971). Selected writings II: Word and language. Mouton.
[31] Jakobson, R., & Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of language. Mouton.
[32] Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M., & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates (Technical Report No. 13). Acoustics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[33] Jatteau, A., Audibert, N., Vasilescu, I., Lamel, L., & Adda-Decker, M. (2025). Final devoicing before it happens: A large-scale study of word-final obstruents in French. Laboratory Phonology, *16*(1).
[34] Kahigi, K. K. (1988). Aspects of Sumbwa diachronic phonology [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University].
[35] Katamba, F. (1989). An introduction to phonology. Longman.
[36] Kießling, R. (1999). Lexical reconstruction in Cushitic. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
[37] Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. In I. S. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 3–91). Hanshin.
[38] Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook, *2*, 85–138.
[39] Kroeger, P. (1990). Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. CSLI Publications.
[40] Kulkarni, V. (1976). Phonological processes in Bhili and Gondi. Indian Linguistics, *37*(2), 45–60.
[41] Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics (4th ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[42] Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press.
[43] Macharia, J. M., Kembo-Sure, E., Oloo, P. A., & Odero, E. O. (2025). Rephonologisation of English loanwords in Kinshasa Lingala through the epenthesis process: An optimality theoretic approach. South African Journal of African Languages, *45*(1), 142–148.
[44] Maghway, J. B. (1989). Iraqw vocabulary [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh].
[45] Maghway, J. B. (2003). The prosody of questions in Iraqw. Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, *5*, 51–65.
[46] Maghway, J. B. (2008). Alagwaisa phonology. University of Dar es Salaam.
[47] Md Bahar, N. F., Zubaidi, R. N. N., & Wan Halim, W. A. A. (2025). A phonology of vowel insertion to Malay cluster consonants by native speaker of Kashmir. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, *5*(1).
[48] Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical phonology [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
[49] Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Reidel.
[50] Mous, M. (1993). A grammar of Iraqw. Helmut Buske Verlag.
[51] Mous, M. (2016). Alagwa, a South Cushitic language of Tanzania: Grammar, texts, and lexicon. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
[52] Mous, M. (2019). The phonology of Iraqw. In S. S. Vogel (Ed.), The handbook of Cushitic languages (pp. 88–114). Oxford University Press.
[53] Mous, M., Qorro, M., & Kießling, R. (2002). Iraqw-English dictionary with an English-Iraqw index. Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
[54] Nordbustad, F. (1988). Iraqw grammar: An analytical study of the Iraqw language. Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
[55] Orkaydo, O. O. (2021). T'ambaaro phonology. Kervan – International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies, *25*(2), 31–52.
[56] Oyoko, A. M. (2025). Reduplication and phonological copying in Lukisa dialect. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, *6*(3), 16–22.
[57] Pandey, P. (2014). Types of phonological processes I [Module prepared for UGC e-Content Creation Project]. Centre for Linguistics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
[58] Pāṇini. (1891). The Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini (S. D. Joshi, Trans.). University of Poona. (Original work published c. 500 BCE).
[59] Robinson, N. (2024). Phonological nativisation of Swahili loanwords in the Nyakyusa language. Kioo cha Lugha, *22*(2).
[60] Sasse, H. J. (1979). The phonology of Cushitic. Helmut Buske Verlag.
[61] Shetty, S. J., & Kumaraswamy, S. (2025). Phonological process in typical children speaking Tulu. Language in India, *25*(8).
[62] Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
[63] Simon, C. (2024). Phonological processes triggered by means of verbs conjugation in Bantu languages. British Journal of Applied Linguistics, *4*(1), 36–44.
[64] Sulub, A. (2020). Morphophonemic alternations in Cushitic word formation. Somali National University Press.
[65] Tesfaye, W. (2023). Kussummiya phonology. Kervan – International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies, *27*(1), 13–46.
[66] Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie [Principles of phonology]. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague.
[67] Wahome, M., & Subiyanto, A. (2023). Phonological processes of the Kikuyu dialectical words: A distinctive features approach. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, *12*(3), 1.
[68] Whiteley, W. H. (1958). The Iraqw language. Oxford University Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Musa, A. H., Kahigi, K., Ligembe, N. (2026). Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 12(4), 102-121. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Musa, A. H.; Kahigi, K.; Ligembe, N. Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2026, 12(4), 102-121. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Musa AH, Kahigi K, Ligembe N. Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania. Commun Linguist Stud. 2026;12(4):102-121. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11,
      author = {Anna Hilonga Musa and Kulikoyela Kahigi and Nestory Ligembe},
      title = {Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania},
      journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {102-121},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20261204.11},
      abstract = {Iraqw is a Southern Cushitic language spoken in northern Tanzania. Previous studies have described some aspects of Iraqw phonology, but more information is needed about the consonantal changes that occur in the language and the conditions under which they take place. This study examined lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw, with the aim of identifying the processes, describing their conditioning environments, and explaining how they operate at the lexical level. The study used a qualitative design to analyse Iraqw consonantal phonological processes. Data were collected through elicitation, documentary sources, and focus group discussions with twelve native Iraqw speakers aged 50-80 from Loto and Bermi villages in Dareda Ward, Babati Rural District, Manyara Region, Tanzania. The analysis was guided by Lexical Phonology and Distinctive Feature Theory. The data were analysed by examining consonant changes and the linguistic environments in which they occur. Phonological rules were then formulated using the underlying representation (UR), lexical representation (LR), and phonetic representation (PR) model. The rules followed the format A → B / C __ D. The findings identified four (4) lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw: consonant deletion, voicing, fortition, and glide formation. The processes occur in different phonological and morphological environments. For example, voicing occurs in plural formation, where the voiceless consonant /t/ changes to the voiced consonant [d]. These findings show that consonant changes in Iraqw follow identifiable patterns that can be explained through phonological rules. The study concludes that the identified processes help explain how consonants behave in different linguistic environments in Iraqw. It recommends that the findings be used in preparing Iraqw language teaching materials, dictionaries, and orthographic guidelines. It also calls for greater government and institutional support for documenting indigenous languages, promoting their use in education, and preserving them for future generations.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Iraqw Consonantal Phonological Processes at Dareda Ward in Manyara Region, Tanzania
    AU  - Anna Hilonga Musa
    AU  - Kulikoyela Kahigi
    AU  - Nestory Ligembe
    Y1  - 2026/10/31
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11
    T2  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
    JF  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
    JO  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
    SP  - 102
    EP  - 121
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2380-2529
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20261204.11
    AB  - Iraqw is a Southern Cushitic language spoken in northern Tanzania. Previous studies have described some aspects of Iraqw phonology, but more information is needed about the consonantal changes that occur in the language and the conditions under which they take place. This study examined lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw, with the aim of identifying the processes, describing their conditioning environments, and explaining how they operate at the lexical level. The study used a qualitative design to analyse Iraqw consonantal phonological processes. Data were collected through elicitation, documentary sources, and focus group discussions with twelve native Iraqw speakers aged 50-80 from Loto and Bermi villages in Dareda Ward, Babati Rural District, Manyara Region, Tanzania. The analysis was guided by Lexical Phonology and Distinctive Feature Theory. The data were analysed by examining consonant changes and the linguistic environments in which they occur. Phonological rules were then formulated using the underlying representation (UR), lexical representation (LR), and phonetic representation (PR) model. The rules followed the format A → B / C __ D. The findings identified four (4) lexical consonantal phonological processes in Iraqw: consonant deletion, voicing, fortition, and glide formation. The processes occur in different phonological and morphological environments. For example, voicing occurs in plural formation, where the voiceless consonant /t/ changes to the voiced consonant [d]. These findings show that consonant changes in Iraqw follow identifiable patterns that can be explained through phonological rules. The study concludes that the identified processes help explain how consonants behave in different linguistic environments in Iraqw. It recommends that the findings be used in preparing Iraqw language teaching materials, dictionaries, and orthographic guidelines. It also calls for greater government and institutional support for documenting indigenous languages, promoting their use in education, and preserving them for future generations.
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections