4. The Role and Function of Echmiadzin in the Persian-Russian Wars
When the Russian army occupied Armenia in the first half of the 19th century, it prepared a map of Vagharshabad. In this map, the remains of the eastern wall of the city, a thousand meters long, in the form of an earthen mound, the location of the churches, the Echmiadzin monastery, and the location of the village that Catholicos Simon Yervantsi had built to the north of the monastery are indicated. Bishop Hovhannes Shakhatoniants also mentioned the wall and the remains of the eastern gate in his memoirs in 1840. Although Vagharshabad has been the religious center of Armenians all over the world for centuries, the number of churches built there is less than that of Yerevan before the terrible earthquake of 1679. Perhaps the reason is that the Catholicosate was located outside this place for ten centuries. During the reign of Karim Khan Zand, chaos had gripped northwestern Iran, and the khans of the region had each established an independent government. King Heraclius of Georgia seized this opportunity and attacked the Yerevan Khanate. He besieged the Yerevan fortress for four months. During this time, the Georgian troops plundered the village and the Echmiadzin monastery, and many of the villagers were forced to migrate to Bayezid and Kars
[7] | Hospian, Shahen. A Brief Look at the History of Yerevan, Peyman, 2006, 37(7), pp. 29-71. |
[7]
. During the last four periods of Iranian domination over this city, from the Safavid period to the early Qajar period, Vagharshabad was always the seat of the Catholicos, and Muslims avoided settling in this place. The village and the surrounding lands also belonged to the monastery by court decree, and the Catholicos administered the affairs of this area. Despite this, the khans of Yerevan always tried to bring it under their control. This demand was sometimes met with resistance from the Catholicos. One of these rulers was Mohammadguli Khan, whom the Catholicos Philippus Aghbaktsi had managed to prevent from interfering in the internal affairs of the monastery and the neighboring village. In retaliation, after the Catholicos' death in 1655, the khan did not allow him to be buried in the Ejmiatsin monastery and was forced to bury him in the Hripsimeh church. Apart from the khan of Yerevan, his agents also constantly oppressed the people of the village and the clergy of the monastery
[8] | Jones, Harford. The Memoirs of Sir Harford Jones, translated by Mani Salehi Allameh, Tehran: Sales; 2007, pp. 195-196. |
[8]
. The book "Life of Harutun Araratyan from Vagharshabad", written at the end of the 18th century, describes this issue in detail. In May 1804, the Shah of Iran demanded that the Russian army immediately evacuate Georgia, Ganja and other khanates. Thus began the first stage of the Russo-Persian war, which lasted until 1813. In mid-July 1804, in a battle near Echmiadzin, the Russian army under the command of Tsitsianov defeated the Iranian army operating under the command of Abbas Mirza, the crown prince and governor of Azerbaijan. In 1805, the khanates of Sheki, Shirvan and Karabakh sided with the Russians; the Russian army immediately occupied their lands
[9] | Grantowski, Edwin R. Vidovich (1970). History of Iran from Ancient Times to the Present, Tehran, Poyish; 1970, pp. 317-318. |
[9]
. After Georgia came under Russian protection and Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar's punitive campaign against Tbilisi ended, the first Russian army attack on the Yerevan Khanate began in 1804 under the command of General Pavel Dmitrievich Sisyanov, a Georgian by birth. Mohammad Khan, the ruler of Yerevan, who had taken up a position in the Echmiadzin Monastery to confront the Russian army, forced the Armenians of the village of Vagharshabad to evacuate the village and move towards the Ottoman border, fearing that they would join the Russian army
[10] | Mkhitaryan, Abel, Vagharshabad. the Capital of Armenia, Armenia, Ejmiatsin; 1874, pp. 55-56. |
[10]
. In Sisyanov's attack on the Yerevan Khanate, the Russian army advanced without any resistance until it reached Vagharshabad, but there it clashed with the Iranian army
[11] | Abadian, Hossein Iranian Narrative of the Iran-Russia Wars, Tehran, Center for Diplomatic Documents and History; 2001, pp. 41-42. |
[11]
. After three days of inconclusive fighting, Sisyanov abandoned the monastery and moved towards the Yerevan fortress. This was the first experience of using the Echmiadzin monastery as a defensive fortress. Sisyanov, who had also not achieved any results from the siege of the Echmiadzin fortress, retreated towards Georgia. On the way, he plundered the Echmiadzin monastery, which the Iranian army had abandoned, under the pretext of Armenian cooperation with the Iranian army
[12] | Vartanian, Sergey. Capitals of Armenia, Yerevan; 1995, pp. 74-75. |
[12]
. Abbas Mirza, the crown prince of Iran, who had realized the consequences of the dissatisfaction of the people of the region with the local rulers, dismissed the Khan of Yerevan. He appointed first Mehdi Qoli Khan and then Muhammad Khan Maraghe as the ruler of the Khanate of Yerevan. In order to gain the support of the Armenian population of the Khanate, the new ruler of Yerevan provided financial assistance to the Catholicos to compensate for the damage done to the Echmiadzin Monastery. Some time later, one of the sons of Fath Ali Shah, Muhammad Ali Mirza Dolatshah, attacked Tbilisi in retaliation for the Russian attack and clashed with the Russian army, but was eventually forced to retreat. On his return, he plundered a number of villages of the Khanate of Yerevan, including the village of Vagharshabad. In 1807, by order of Fath-Ali Shah Qajar, one of his relatives, Hussein Qoli Khan Qajar, who was the ruler of Qazvin, became the Khan of Yerevan. He also made his brother, Hassan Khan Qajar, who was a tyrant and materialist, his assistant. Oppression of the people of the region resumed, preparing the situation for the Russian campaign. In 1805, Russia once again began military operations in the region, and in 1808, the Russian army under the command of Ivan Godovich attacked the two Sheki factions - Shirvan-Moghan and the Erivan Khanate. The Sheki faction was victorious, and in 1813, the Treaty of Golestan was concluded, but after a three-month siege of the Erivan fortress, the Russian army was forced to retreat. During the retreat, the Russian soldiers plundered the Ejmiatsin monastery. In these battles, Sir Harford Jones, the representative of the British ruler in India, was in the army of Crown Prince Abbas Mirza. He visited the Yerevan Fortress and the Och Church and met with the Catholicos. In his memoirs, he wrote about the hospitality of the Catholicos and his dissatisfaction with the Russian army's attack on the Yerevan Khanate and the plundering of the monastery. In 1826, the war began again. By order of the Khan of Yerevan, the inhabitants of the villages located on the left bank of the Aras River, including the village of Vagharshabad, were forced to move to the other side of the Aras River. After the end of the war, Bishop Nerses of Ashtarak wrote in one of his letters that all the villages of the Ararat Plain were uninhabited. Seeing Ararat, I felt a deep admiration and respect for this mountain that I have never felt before for any other mountain. This mountain is very far from Yerevan, but despite this, apart from the other mountains, which seem to have lined up behind it to pay homage at a certain distance, it alone, even with both its twin peaks, completely dominates that city and from under its half-crown of permanent snow, with its glory and splendor, it evokes in the heart of every viewer all the memories of the second cradle of humanity, along with a sense of respect. According to an Armenian legend - which, like many of their other legends and traditions, is worthy of attention and respect - Yerevan is located on the site of the first land that Noah saw from the top of the sacred mountain after the flood subsided and the waters receded. With such a history and ancient authenticity, this city had long been shrouded in darkness and silence, and its fame - as has been the fate of many other cities - began simultaneously with its misfortunes. From the reign of Shah Ismail Safavi to the beginning of the reign of Nader Shah, this city changed hands four times by the Persians and the Turks, and was plundered and plundered. Until 1827 [1243 AH] it was considered part of the territory of Iran, but in that year it was besieged and occupied by Paskevich, and in this way Yerevan was annexed to the vast territory of the Tsar and became the capital of Russian Armenia
. In the war that took place between the Iranian army under the command of the Crown Prince, Abbas Mirza, and the Russian army under the command of General Paskevich, the Iranian army was defeated and on October 3, 1827, the Yerevan fortress fell into the hands of the Russian army. Then, the Russian army invaded the southern regions of the Aras River, and as a result, the Treaty of Turkmenchay was concluded. According to this treaty, the Yerevan Khanate came under the rule of the Russian Empire. In the midst of the war, the Russian army captured the Echmiadzin monastery while advancing towards the Yerevan fortress, but then the army of Hussein Khan besieged the monastery. Paskevich sent reinforcements to rescue the besieged. Abbas Mirza and the Russian troops met north of the village of Vagharshabad, and a bloody battle ensued. In 1833, Russia erected a monument at the site of the battle in memory of the soldiers killed in the battle. According to the inscription on the monument, 1,131 Russian soldiers were killed in the battle. After the Russians took control of the village and monastery of Echmiadzin, they turned it into a hospital for Russian soldiers. The Russian Empire intended to repopulate the villages of the Yerevan and Nakhchivan khanates, which had been devastated and depopulated by long wars. It also sought to harm the economy of this region by abandoning Iranian Azerbaijan. To achieve these two goals, the Russians took advantage of the unfavorable situation that the khans of Iranian Azerbaijan had created for the Armenian inhabitants of the region. They began to promote a favorable living situation for Armenians north of the Aras River and by 1830, using the provisions mentioned in the Treaty of Turkmenchay, they had facilitated the migration of more than 45,000 Armenians living in Iranian Azerbaijan to the north of the Aras River
[13] | Собрание актов, относящихся к истории образования армянского народа, М. 1838, pp. 180-181. |
[13]
. Arakel Grigor Babakhanyan, known as Leo, a 19th-century historian, believes that many Armenians from Azerbaijani villages were forced to migrate by the Russian army, and according to Russian plans, 65,000 people were supposed to migrate north of the Aras River, but with the intervention of Abbas Mirza and the sending of a letter of protest to Paskevich, 20,000 people remained in the villages of the region
[14] | Sarkisian, Norik. The resettlement of Armenians in Iran by the Russian government in 1828, Ejmiatsin, Peyman, 2012, 22(2), pp. 55-69. |
[14]
. The immigrants settled in various villages and towns of the Ararat plain, and some of them also settled in the village of Vagharshabad, although exact statistics on their number are not available. In addition to forcing the Armenians to emigrate, Russia sent about 80,000 Russians, known as the Malakan sect, to various regions of the South Caucasus, but they did not settle in the village of Vagharshabad due to their religious beliefs. Abbas Mirza, who was aware of the harmful consequences of this great migration, worked hard for the Armenians. He even renovated a number of their monasteries, including the Karakalpak and the Holy Stepanos monasteries, and took steps to transfer the religious center of the Armenians from the monastery of Echmiadzin to Karakalpak. With the death of Abbas Mirza, his efforts remained incomplete
[15] | Hospian, Shahn (2008). Monastery of Saint Thaddeus, Peyman, 2008, 46(12), pp. 5-37. |
[15]
.
In a decree from the Qajar Shah addressed to the Caliph Ephraim, it was emphasized that, given the importance of the prosperity of the Ojaq, it was necessary for the Caliph to gather the scattered Armenians who were in Russian territory and under the leadership of Echmiadzin and enter the borders of the Qajar state. In fact, the Qajar Shah claimed control over all the Armenians who were under the command of Echmiadzin, even though they lived in Russian territory, and it was necessary for these Armenians to return to the land of Iran. "Your Highnesses, the Viceroy of Barsog and the Caliph Narcissus and other Mehrasias of the Ojaq of the Church should know that the petition of the Caliph Ephraim has been considered. Your Highnesses need to emphasize that the Highnesses of the Consultative Council should depart for these borders as soon as possible and be busy with organizing the Ojaq affairs. Your Highnesses should also strengthen the Ojaq affairs according to their own rules and rituals and engage in prayer upon the arrival of the Highness of the Consultative Council. His Eminence the Caliph Ephraim will issue a decree from the Russian government regarding the bringing of the scattered Armenians of the Ojaq who are in the Great Council, Panbak, and Georgia. Therefore, it is also decided by His Eminences to write a commentary on His Eminence the Caliph Ephraim that he will also bring the aforementioned division with him so that the Ojaq cause will flourish and spread fully"
[16] | Gostikian, Christine, Persian Orders of Matenadaran (1798-1829), Yerevan, Armenia, 2021, 5(29). 368-369. |
[16]
.
The Qajar government, in accordance with the decrees and orders of the Safavid kings who had issued endowments for the welfare and development of Vank, also emphasized these decrees and paid attention to the prosperity of the Armenian churches. "Alijah Fatanat and Farast, accompanied by the great dignitaries and the Christian dignitaries, presented that Vank Tatuf, by virtue of the decrees of the Safavid kings of Ferdows, the place of endowments in the aforementioned places and due to the aforementioned disruption, has become prosperous and popular, and requested that, by virtue of the decree of the union of the two states and the concurrence of the two powers, a firm and enforceable decree be issued in this regard. Therefore, an enforceable decree was issued in accordance with the aforementioned decrees, which has the honor of being issued, that the interest of the said Vank endowments located in the aforementioned places shall continue to be exclusively for the benefit of Vank and its employees, and shall not be contrary to the condition of the endowment"
[17] | Gostikian, Christine, Persian Orders of Matenadaran (1798-1829), Yerevan, Armenia, 2021, 5(66). 470-471. |
[17]
. The decrees of the Safavid kings regarding the Vank endowments in Russian territory indicate the dynasty's special attention to Armenian religious and cultural issues. These endowments were important as financial and support resources for the preservation and expansion of Armenian culture outside of Iran, especially in areas under Russian influence. By issuing these decrees, the Safavid kings sought to strengthen relations with the Armenians and protect them against external pressures.
Given that at times the Caliph of Och-Kelissa would become indebted and had to request leave from the Qajar Shah to pay off his debt and prevent distress to the Ojaq and Armenians of Och-Kelissa in order to prepare for the payment of his debt to Russia. The Qajar Shah also agreed to the Caliph's departure to Russia to collect donations, zakat, and khums, in accordance with the treaty of friendship between the two governments of Iran and Russia. "His Highness the Caliph of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the Caliph of the Holy Sepulchre, should know that he had requested leave regarding his debt and distress, and that he had made provision for his debts and those of the monks of the said Sepulchre. Since there is now perfect friendship and goodwill between the government of the Holy Sepulchre and the Russian government, and the settlement of the said Sepulchre is also in the interest of the merciful. It is clear that we will never be satisfied that the said Sepulchre is in a state of poverty and debt, and we will not be disturbed if His Highness the Caliph went to Karabakh and the Holy Sepulchre to make provision for his debts from the Christian nations in those provinces. In view of the perfect alliance between the two governments, those provinces will not be different from the provinces of the Sultan. Therefore, it is decided that after obtaining knowledge and understanding of the content of the decree, His Highness the Amir will be granted leave and authorized to travel to the provinces to both regulate the affairs of the Armenians there and make provisions for his debts"
[18] | Gostikian, Christine, Persian Orders of Matenadaran (1798-1829), Yerevan, Armenia, 2021, 5(51). 450-451. |
[18]
.
The loyalty of the Caliph of Och-Kalesa to the Qajar government and the good relations between the Caliph and the Qajar Shah had caused the prosperity of Och-Kalesa and its affairs to be emphasized by the Qajar government. Therefore, the handling of the affairs of the Armenians under the command of Vank, who was in Russian territory, was also under the supervision of the Caliph of Och-Kalesa. For this purpose, the Caliph and the agent of Och-Kalesa traveled to and from Armenian churches in Russian territory to inspect the churches and collect donations, zakat, and khums. The Qajar government also sent letters to the Russian government for the comfort, welfare, and security of the Caliph, emphasizing the respect and honor of the Caliph, and considered the right to appoint and supervise the Caliph of Ochkiss to be the right of the Qajar government alone. "The supreme ruling was that since the servants of the Vank Tatf of the Qapan, who are the workers and administrators of the zakat funds there, travel back and forth to carry out the aforementioned important requirements, it should be agreed upon that no one should interfere without direction and reason, and that they should be allowed to carry out the aforementioned Vank affairs at their leisure, and in this regard, according to the usual regulations, they should not violate and are responsible"
[19] | Gostikian, Christine, Persian Orders of Matenadaran (1798-1829), Yerevan, Armenia, 2021, 5(65). 468-469. |
[19]
.