Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification

Published in Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 4)
Received: 2 October 2025     Accepted: 13 October 2025     Published: 30 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by substantial phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. The recent application of person-centered computational models has allowed the identification of novel clinical subtypes with distinct genetic underpinnings. Objective: To review recent literature on the classification of ASD subtypes through integrative approaches combining clinical, phenotypic, and genomic data, with emphasis on diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Methods: A narrative review of articles published between 2018 and 2024 was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using search terms such as “autism subtypes,” “phenotypic clustering,” “genetic architecture in ASD,” and “precision medicine in autism.” Eligible studies included original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Results: Recent studies have identified at least four robust clinical-biological ASD subtypes using finite mixture modeling and person-centered analyses: (1) social and behavioral challenges, (2) mixed ASD with developmental delay, (3) moderate challenges, and (4) broadly affected subtype. Each group presents distinctive patterns in symptoms, comorbidities, developmental trajectories, and genetic architecture. Both de novo mutations and inherited variants play key roles in molecular differentiation among subtypes. Conclusions: The identification of more homogeneous subgroups within the autism spectrum represents a crucial step toward personalized medicine in ASD. Emerging clinical tools derived from these classifications may enhance prognosis prediction and guide tailored interventions.

Published in Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11
Page(s) 159-165
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Clinical Subtypes, Phenotypic Clustering, Genetic Variants, Personalized Medicine

References
[1] Lord C, Elsabbagh M, Baird G, Veenstra-VanderWeele J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2018; 392(10146): 508-520.
[2] Al-Sarraj Y, Taha RZ, Al-Dous E, Ahram D, Abbasi S, Abuazab E, et al. The genetic landscape of autism spectrum disorder in the Middle Eastern population. Front Genet. 2024; 15: 1363849.
[3] Matoba N, Liang D, Sun H, Aygün N, McAfee J, Davis JE, et al. Common genetic risk variants identified in the SPARK cohort support DDHD2 as a candidate risk gene for autism. Transl Psychiatry. 2020; 10: 265.
[4] Wigdor EM, Gandal MJ, Parikshak NN, et al. Genetic correlates of phenotypic heterogeneity in autism. Nat Genet. 2022; 54: 212-224.
[5] Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative. About SPARK: Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge 2025 Apr 8 (cited 2025 Jul 19). Available from:
[6] Grove J, Ripke S, Als TD, Mattheisen M, Walters RK, Won H, et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(3): 431-444.
[7] Satterstrom FK, Kosmicki JA, Wang J, Breen MS, De Rubeis S, An JY, et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell. 2020; 180(3): 568-584.e23.
[8] De Rubeis S, He X, Goldberg AP, Poultney CS, Samocha K, Cicek AE, et al. Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism. Nature. 2014; 515(7526): 209-215.
[9] Al-Beltagi M. Pre-autism: Advancing early identification and intervention in autism. World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(34): 6748-6753.
[10] Litman A, Sauerwald N, Green Snyder L, Foss-Feig J, Park CY, Hao Y, Dinstein I, Theesfeld CL, Troyanskaya OG. Decomposition of phenotypic heterogeneity in autism reveals underlying genetic programs. Nat Genet. 2025.
[11] Wendling P. Four biologically, clinically distinct autism subtypes identified. Medscape Medical News. 2025 Jul 16 (cited 2025 Jul 19). Available from:
[12] Cortese S, Bellato A, Gabellone A, Marzulli L, Matera E, Parlatini V, et al. (2024). Latest clinical frontiers related to autism diagnostic strategies. Cell Reports Medicine, 6(2), 101916.
[13] Fuller EA, Kaiser AP. The effects of early intervention on social communication outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020; 50(5): 1683-1698.
[14] Franz L, Goodwin C, Rieder A, Metheis M, Damiano DL. Early intervention for very young children with or at high likelihood for autism spectrum disorder: an overview of reviews. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022; 64(9): 1063-1073.
[15] French L, Kennedy EM. Early intervention for infants and young children with, or at-risk of, autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018; 59(4): 444-458.
[16] Vivanti G, Stahmer AC, et al. Can the Early Start Denver Model be considered ABA practice? Behav Anal Pract. 2021; 14(1): 260-269.
[17] Dong L, Xu B, Wang X, Liu J, Zhang L, et al. Interactions of genetic risks for autism and the broad autism phenotype. Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14: 1110080.
[18] Lin A, Rorvik A, et al. Conceptualizing and measuring ‘problem behavior’ in early childhood in ASD: a systematic review. JCPP Res Pract. 2025; ahead of print.
[19] Bedford R, Waldmann S, et al. Machine learning of clinical phenotypes facilitates autism screening: insights from AGRE and transcriptomics. Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1): 95291.
[20] Gómez-Cotilla R, López-de-Uralde-Selva MA, Valero-Aguayo L. Efficacy of early intervention programmes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psicol Educ. 2024; 30(1): 1-10.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Cardenas, V. M. (2025). Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification. Frontiers, 5(4), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Cardenas, V. M. Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification. Frontiers. 2025, 5(4), 159-165. doi: 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Cardenas VM. Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification. Frontiers. 2025;5(4):159-165. doi: 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11,
      author = {Vicente Martinez Cardenas},
      title = {Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification
    },
      journal = {Frontiers},
      volume = {5},
      number = {4},
      pages = {159-165},
      doi = {10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.frontiers.20250504.11},
      abstract = {Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by substantial phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. The recent application of person-centered computational models has allowed the identification of novel clinical subtypes with distinct genetic underpinnings. Objective: To review recent literature on the classification of ASD subtypes through integrative approaches combining clinical, phenotypic, and genomic data, with emphasis on diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Methods: A narrative review of articles published between 2018 and 2024 was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using search terms such as “autism subtypes,” “phenotypic clustering,” “genetic architecture in ASD,” and “precision medicine in autism.” Eligible studies included original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Results: Recent studies have identified at least four robust clinical-biological ASD subtypes using finite mixture modeling and person-centered analyses: (1) social and behavioral challenges, (2) mixed ASD with developmental delay, (3) moderate challenges, and (4) broadly affected subtype. Each group presents distinctive patterns in symptoms, comorbidities, developmental trajectories, and genetic architecture. Both de novo mutations and inherited variants play key roles in molecular differentiation among subtypes. Conclusions: The identification of more homogeneous subgroups within the autism spectrum represents a crucial step toward personalized medicine in ASD. Emerging clinical tools derived from these classifications may enhance prognosis prediction and guide tailored interventions.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Biological and Clinical Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Recent Advances in Phenotypic and Genetic Classification
    
    AU  - Vicente Martinez Cardenas
    Y1  - 2025/10/30
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11
    T2  - Frontiers
    JF  - Frontiers
    JO  - Frontiers
    SP  - 159
    EP  - 165
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7197
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250504.11
    AB  - Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by substantial phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. The recent application of person-centered computational models has allowed the identification of novel clinical subtypes with distinct genetic underpinnings. Objective: To review recent literature on the classification of ASD subtypes through integrative approaches combining clinical, phenotypic, and genomic data, with emphasis on diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Methods: A narrative review of articles published between 2018 and 2024 was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, using search terms such as “autism subtypes,” “phenotypic clustering,” “genetic architecture in ASD,” and “precision medicine in autism.” Eligible studies included original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Results: Recent studies have identified at least four robust clinical-biological ASD subtypes using finite mixture modeling and person-centered analyses: (1) social and behavioral challenges, (2) mixed ASD with developmental delay, (3) moderate challenges, and (4) broadly affected subtype. Each group presents distinctive patterns in symptoms, comorbidities, developmental trajectories, and genetic architecture. Both de novo mutations and inherited variants play key roles in molecular differentiation among subtypes. Conclusions: The identification of more homogeneous subgroups within the autism spectrum represents a crucial step toward personalized medicine in ASD. Emerging clinical tools derived from these classifications may enhance prognosis prediction and guide tailored interventions.
    
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections