Effect of film packaging on fresh yellow maize (Zea mays L.) on the cob after harvesting was tested. Proximate, mineral and sensory qualities of fresh maize samples subjected to passive modified atmosphere packaging (PMAP) and unpackaged samples at day 1, 2, 3 and 4 of storage at tropical ambient temperature (28±2°C) and 80% RH were carried out. The samples were compared with freshly harvested maize (FHM) which served as control. Results of proximate composition showed that the sample T1 (undehusked maize) maintained its moisture content at day 1 and 2 of storage and had the highest total sugar content when compared to other stored samples. Mineral composition showed higher contents of potassium, phosphorus, sodium and magnesium in control sample. Mineral content of T1 (undehusked maize) was not different significantly (p<0.05) from the control. T2 (dehusked maize) and PMAP samples had the lowest values due to their rate of deterioration at day 3 and 4 of storage. The sensory evaluation result showed the control sample to be the most preferred and followed by T1 in all the quality attributes (colour, taste, aroma and overall acceptability) evaluated. Due to the fast deterioration of fresh maize qualities after harvesting, it can therefore be concluded that PMAP had no impact in extending the storage life of fresh maize at ambient temperature.
Published in | International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14 |
Page(s) | 19-24 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ambient Temperature, Composition, Dehusked, Fresh Maize, Packaging, Postharvest
[1] | A. Ahmadi and P. Ziarati, “Chemical composition profile of canned and frozen sweet corn (Zeamays L.) in Iran,” Oriental Journal of Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1065-1070, 2015. |
[2] | E. T. Nuss and S. A. Tanumihardjo, “Maize: a paramount staple crop in the context of global nutrition,” Comprehensive Review of Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 9, pp. 417-436, 2010. |
[3] | I. B. Oluwalana, “Comparative effects of sprouting on proximate, mineral composition and functional properties of white and yellow maize (Zea maysvarsaccharata),” Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Science, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 111-115, 2014. |
[4] | J. E. Iken and N. A. Amusa, “Maize research and production in Nigeria,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 302-307, 2004. |
[5] | R. A. Suleiman, K. A. Rosentrater and B. J. Carl, “Effects of deterioration parameters on storage of maize: a review,” Journal of Natural Sciences Research, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 147-168, 2013. |
[6] | W. Awoyale, B. Maziya-Dixon, O. E. Alamu and A. Menkir, “Effect of packaging materials and storage conditions on the degradation of xanthophylls in yellow-maize ogi powder,” Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 522-527, 2016. |
[7] | A. Junpatiw, K. Lertrat, K. Lomthaisong and R. Tangwongchai, “Effects of steaming, boiling and frozen storage on carotenoid contents of various sweet corn cultivars,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2219-2225, 2013. |
[8] | P. More, T. Mhaske and S. Housalma, “Effects of packaging films on sensory aspects of fresh sweet corn kernels at different storage conditions,” International Journal of Tropical Agriculture, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 3661-3664, 2015. |
[9] | H. P. Geetha, V. Palanimuthu and B. Ranganna, A study on shelf-life extension of freshly harvested sweet corn cobs (Zea mays var. rugosa). Int. J. Proc. and Post Harvest Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 131-135, 2014. |
[10] | I. B. Oluwalana, “Minimizing fruit wastages in Nigeria,” International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77-87, 2010. |
[11] | P. V. Mahajan, O. J. Caleb, Z. Singh, C. B. Watkins and M. Geyer, “Postharvest treatments of fresh produce,” Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society A, vol. 372, pp. 1-19, 2014. |
[12] | AOAC, Official methods of analysis (18th Edn.), “Association of Official Analytical Chemists,”Washington, DC, USA, 2005. |
[13] | S. S. Nielsen, “Phenol sulphuric acid method for total carbohydrates,” Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Food Science Texts Series, pp 47-53, 2009. |
[14] | A. I. Ihekoronye and P. O. Ngoddy, Intergrated Food Science and Technology for Tropics. Macmillan, London. 1985, pp. 386. |
[15] | J. C. Rickman, D. M. Barret and C. M. Bruhn, “Review. Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen, and canned foods and vegetables I. Vitamin C and B and phenolic compounds,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 87, pp. 930-944, 2007a. |
[16] | R. E. Hardenburg, A. E. Watada and C. Y. Wang, “The commercial storage of fruit, vegetables, and florist and nursery stock,” Agricultural handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C, 1986. |
[17] | D. Shobha, T. A. Sreeramasetty, Puttaramanaik and K. T. Pandurange Gowda, “Evaluation of maize genotypes for physical and chemical composition at silky and hard stage,” Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 311-314, 2010. |
[18] | K. B. Evensen and C. D. Boyer, “Carbohydrate composition and sensory quality of fresh and stored sweet corn,” Journal for the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol. 111, pp. 734-738, 1986. |
[19] | J. K. Olsen, J. E. Giles and R. A. Jordan, “Post-harvest carbohydrate changes and sensory quality of three sweet corn cultivars,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 44, no. 3-4, pp. 179-189, 1990. |
[20] | V. M. Ghorpade, M. A. Hanna and S. J. Jadhav, “Sweet corn. Handbook of vegetable science and technology, production, composition, storage and processing,” Salunkhe, D. K. and Kadam, S. S. (Editors). Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, NY, vo. 27, 1998, pp. 609-646. |
[21] | B. Kara, A. Ertek and B. Arar, “Mineral Nutrient Content of Sweet Corn under Deficit Irrigation,” Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 22, pp. 54-61, 2016. |
[22] | B. M. John and R. W. Jeanne, “Human health, the nutritional quality of harvested food and sustainable farming systems,” http://www.nutritionsecurity.org/PDF/NSI_White%.pdf (accessed September 2012). |
[23] | I. B. Oluwalana and M. O. Oluwamukomi, “Changes in qualities of ripening plantains fruits stored at tropical ambient conditions,” International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 203-207, 2010. |
APA Style
Florence Abolaji Bello, Isaac Babatunde Oluwalana. (2017). Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Nutritive Values and Sensory Qualities of Fresh Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Tropical Ambient Storage Condition. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 6(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14
ACS Style
Florence Abolaji Bello; Isaac Babatunde Oluwalana. Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Nutritive Values and Sensory Qualities of Fresh Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Tropical Ambient Storage Condition. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 6(1), 19-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14
AMA Style
Florence Abolaji Bello, Isaac Babatunde Oluwalana. Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Nutritive Values and Sensory Qualities of Fresh Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Tropical Ambient Storage Condition. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2017;6(1):19-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14, author = {Florence Abolaji Bello and Isaac Babatunde Oluwalana}, title = {Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Nutritive Values and Sensory Qualities of Fresh Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Tropical Ambient Storage Condition}, journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {19-24}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20170601.14}, abstract = {Effect of film packaging on fresh yellow maize (Zea mays L.) on the cob after harvesting was tested. Proximate, mineral and sensory qualities of fresh maize samples subjected to passive modified atmosphere packaging (PMAP) and unpackaged samples at day 1, 2, 3 and 4 of storage at tropical ambient temperature (28±2°C) and 80% RH were carried out. The samples were compared with freshly harvested maize (FHM) which served as control. Results of proximate composition showed that the sample T1 (undehusked maize) maintained its moisture content at day 1 and 2 of storage and had the highest total sugar content when compared to other stored samples. Mineral composition showed higher contents of potassium, phosphorus, sodium and magnesium in control sample. Mineral content of T1 (undehusked maize) was not different significantly (p<0.05) from the control. T2 (dehusked maize) and PMAP samples had the lowest values due to their rate of deterioration at day 3 and 4 of storage. The sensory evaluation result showed the control sample to be the most preferred and followed by T1 in all the quality attributes (colour, taste, aroma and overall acceptability) evaluated. Due to the fast deterioration of fresh maize qualities after harvesting, it can therefore be concluded that PMAP had no impact in extending the storage life of fresh maize at ambient temperature.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Nutritive Values and Sensory Qualities of Fresh Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Tropical Ambient Storage Condition AU - Florence Abolaji Bello AU - Isaac Babatunde Oluwalana Y1 - 2017/01/14 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14 T2 - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JF - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JO - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences SP - 19 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2716 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.14 AB - Effect of film packaging on fresh yellow maize (Zea mays L.) on the cob after harvesting was tested. Proximate, mineral and sensory qualities of fresh maize samples subjected to passive modified atmosphere packaging (PMAP) and unpackaged samples at day 1, 2, 3 and 4 of storage at tropical ambient temperature (28±2°C) and 80% RH were carried out. The samples were compared with freshly harvested maize (FHM) which served as control. Results of proximate composition showed that the sample T1 (undehusked maize) maintained its moisture content at day 1 and 2 of storage and had the highest total sugar content when compared to other stored samples. Mineral composition showed higher contents of potassium, phosphorus, sodium and magnesium in control sample. Mineral content of T1 (undehusked maize) was not different significantly (p<0.05) from the control. T2 (dehusked maize) and PMAP samples had the lowest values due to their rate of deterioration at day 3 and 4 of storage. The sensory evaluation result showed the control sample to be the most preferred and followed by T1 in all the quality attributes (colour, taste, aroma and overall acceptability) evaluated. Due to the fast deterioration of fresh maize qualities after harvesting, it can therefore be concluded that PMAP had no impact in extending the storage life of fresh maize at ambient temperature. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -