Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar; Abdullah K. Agabawi; Maryam H. Habib; Sondos Alturkistani; Bashair Azhari

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar, Abdullah K. Agabawi, Maryam H. Habib, Sondos Alturkistani, Bashair Azhari

Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 26 November 2016 Accepted: 19 December 2016 Published: 18 January 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The Objective of the study Is to assess the nutrition during pregnancy in Saudi women. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to collect, describe and analyze the nutritional status during pregnancy, performed on pregnant women.(May 2016 - July 2016). (210) patients selected from the antenatal clinic KAUH. Inclusion criteria include pregnant women, not in a special diet, and willing to participate. The ethics committee of KAU approved the study. Data collected using a Questionnaire (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed and validated in English language. The questionnaire proposed, used as an indicator of a healthy nutritional diet. Which include eight questions. Results; The total number questionnaires (187) were ready for analysis the positive response rate was only (89.1%). The mean ± stander deviation of age (28.79 ± 5.418), Gravidity (2.98 ± 2.180), Gestational Age (29.42 ± 7.920). The mean of hemoglobin (9.79 ± 1.49), and BMI range from 14 – 45 with a mean of (27.33 ± 6.59). When analyzing the questionnaires pregnant women divided into two group. Group 1 (171) those women who consumes healthy diet (eight questions answered yes) and Group 2 only 16 pregnant women out 187 (8.56%) consumes a poor diet. (25.7%) had hemoglobin was less than 9mg/dL. The group the poor diet had more small baby which was statistically significant with P < 0.026. Comparing the two groups the fetal complication were statistically significant higher in the poor diet group, with a p value < 0.004 with OD ratio 95% confidence limit 7.318 (2.128-25.166). The level of hemoglobin were less than 10 mg/dL 0.280 (0.087 - 0.902) P < 0.022. The MBI less than 25 with ODs ratio and 95% cl 0.364 (0.121 - 1.092) and p < 0.54. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi pregnant women only 8.56%, and 25.7% their hemoglobin were less than 9gm/dL and their BMI were 27. 33. Poor diet affect only the level of hemoglobin and fetal weight at delivery.

Published in	International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
Page(s)	25-30
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Nutrition, Pregnancy, Saudi Arabia

References

[1]	Grieger, J. & Clifton, V., 2014. A Review of the Impact of Dietary Intakes in Human Pregnancy on Infant Birthweight. Nutrients, 7 (1), pp. 153–178.
[2]	Ng, S. W. et al., 2011. Nutrition transition in the United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 65 (12), pp. 1328–1337.
[3]	Walsh, J. M. & Mcauliffe, F. M., 2015. Impact of maternal nutrition on pregnancy outcome – Does it matter what pregnant women eat? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 29 (1), pp. 63–78.
[4]	Kelishadi, R., Mansourian, M. & Akbari, Z., 2015. Relationship of the intake of different food groups by pregnant mothers with the birth weight and gestational age: Need for public and individual educational programs. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4 (1), p. 23.
[5]	Keenan, K. et al., 2013. Poor nutrition during pregnancy and lactation negatively affects neurodevelopment of the offspring: evidence from a translational primate model. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98 (2), pp. 396–402.
[6]	Hankey, C. R., 2015. Importance of good health and nutrition before and during pregnancy. Early years nutrition and healthy weight Stewart/Early years nutrition and healthy weight, pp. 1–13.
[7]	Slavin, J. L. & Lloyd, B., 2012. Health Benefits of Fruits and Vegetables. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 3 (4), pp. 506–516.
[8]	Skerrett, P. J. & Willett, W. C., 2010. Essentials of Healthy Eating: A Guide. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 55 (6), pp. 492–501.
[9]	Wenstrom, K. D., 2014. The FDA’s new advice on fish: it’s complicated. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 211 (5).
[10]	Emmett, P. M., Jones, L. R. & Golding, J., 2015. Pregnancy diet and associated outcomes in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Nutr Rev Nutrition Reviews, 73 (suppl 3), pp. 154–174.
[11]	Geissler, C. & Singh, M., 2011. Iron, Meat and Health. Nutrients, 3 (12), pp. 283–316.
[12]	Alman, B. L. et al., 2016. Associations between Maternal Water Consumption and Birth Defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (2000-2005). Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology.
[13]	Castro, M. B. T. D. et al., 2016. High cholesterol dietary intake during pregnancy is associated with large for gestational age in a sample of low-income women of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Maternal & Child Nutrition.
[14]	Khoushabi F, Saraswathi G. Association Between Maternal Nutrition Status and Birth Weight of Neonates in Selected Hospitals in Mysore City, India. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2010 Jan; 9 (12): 1124–30.
[15]	Shamah-Levy, T. et al., 2003. Anemia in Mexican women: a public health problem. Salud Pública de México, 45, pp. 499–507.
[16]	Khaskheli, M. et al., 2016. Iron deficiency anaemia is still a major killer of pregnant women. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pak J Med Sci, 32 (3).
[17]	Zerfu, T. A. & Ayele, H. T., 2013. Micronutrients and pregnancy; effect of supplementation on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Nutrition Journal Nutr J, 12 (1).
[18]	Kapil, U., 2009. Multiple micronutrient supplements will not reduce incidence of low birthweight. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 34 (2), p. 85.
[19]	Farahat, M. F., El-Shafie, M. M. & Waly, M. I., 2015. Food safety knowledge and practices among Saudi women. Food Control, 47, pp. 427–435.
[20]	Okubo, H. et al., 2010. Dietary patterns during pregnancy and the risk of postpartum depression in Japan: the Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. British Journal of Nutrition, 105 (08), pp. 1251–1257.
[21]	Murakami, K. et al., 2009. Education, but not occupation or household income, is positively related to favorable dietary intake patterns in pregnant Japanese women: the Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. Nutrition Research, 29 (3), pp. 164–172.
[22]	Li, L. & Werler, M. M., 2009. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of upper respiratory tract infection in pregnant women. Public Health Nutrition, 13 (02), p. 276.
[23]	Taha, A. et al., 2014. Iron Deficiency Anaemia In Reproductive Age Women Attending Obstetrics And Gynecology Outpatient Of University Health Centre In Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 11 (2), p. 339.
[24]	Saadia, Z. et al., 2012. Dietary practices of Saudi women during puerperium. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 39 (4), pp. 799–805.
[25]	Wyness, L., 2011. Diet during pregnancy can lead to obesity in offspring. Nutrition Bulletin, 36 (3), pp. 367–369.
[26]	Vézina-Im, L.-A. et al., 2016. Validity and reliability of a brief self-reported questionnaire assessing fruit and vegetable consumption among pregnant women. BMC Public Health, 16 (1).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar, Abdullah K. Agabawi, Maryam H. Habib, Sondos Alturkistani, Bashair Azhari. (2017). Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 6(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar; Abdullah K. Agabawi; Maryam H. Habib; Sondos Alturkistani; Bashair Azhari. Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 6(1), 25-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar, Abdullah K. Agabawi, Maryam H. Habib, Sondos Alturkistani, Bashair Azhari. Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2017;6(1):25-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15,
  author = {Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar and Abdullah K. Agabawi and Maryam H. Habib and Sondos Alturkistani and Bashair Azhari},
  title = {Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {25-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  abstract = {The Objective of the study Is to assess the nutrition during pregnancy in Saudi women. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to collect, describe and analyze the nutritional status during pregnancy, performed on pregnant women.(May 2016 - July 2016). (210) patients selected from the antenatal clinic KAUH. Inclusion criteria include pregnant women, not in a special diet, and willing to participate. The ethics committee of KAU approved the study. Data collected using a Questionnaire (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed and validated in English language. The questionnaire proposed, used as an indicator of a healthy nutritional diet. Which include eight questions. Results; The total number questionnaires (187) were ready for analysis the positive response rate was only (89.1%). The mean ± stander deviation of age (28.79 ± 5.418), Gravidity (2.98 ± 2.180), Gestational Age (29.42 ± 7.920). The mean of hemoglobin (9.79 ± 1.49), and BMI range from 14 – 45 with a mean of (27.33 ± 6.59). When analyzing the questionnaires pregnant women divided into two group. Group 1 (171) those women who consumes healthy diet (eight questions answered yes) and Group 2 only 16 pregnant women out 187 (8.56%) consumes a poor diet. (25.7%) had hemoglobin was less than 9mg/dL. The group the poor diet had more small baby which was statistically significant with P < 0.026. Comparing the two groups the fetal complication were statistically significant higher in the poor diet group, with a p value < 0.004 with OD ratio 95% confidence limit 7.318 (2.128-25.166). The level of hemoglobin were less than 10 mg/dL 0.280 (0.087 - 0.902) P < 0.022. The MBI less than 25 with ODs ratio and 95% cl 0.364 (0.121 - 1.092) and p < 0.54. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi pregnant women only 8.56%, and 25.7% their hemoglobin were less than 9gm/dL and their BMI were 27. 33. Poor diet affect only the level of hemoglobin and fetal weight at delivery.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy
AU  - Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar
AU  - Abdullah K. Agabawi
AU  - Maryam H. Habib
AU  - Sondos Alturkistani
AU  - Bashair Azhari
Y1  - 2017/01/18
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 25
EP  - 30
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
AB  - The Objective of the study Is to assess the nutrition during pregnancy in Saudi women. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to collect, describe and analyze the nutritional status during pregnancy, performed on pregnant women.(May 2016 - July 2016). (210) patients selected from the antenatal clinic KAUH. Inclusion criteria include pregnant women, not in a special diet, and willing to participate. The ethics committee of KAU approved the study. Data collected using a Questionnaire (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed and validated in English language. The questionnaire proposed, used as an indicator of a healthy nutritional diet. Which include eight questions. Results; The total number questionnaires (187) were ready for analysis the positive response rate was only (89.1%). The mean ± stander deviation of age (28.79 ± 5.418), Gravidity (2.98 ± 2.180), Gestational Age (29.42 ± 7.920). The mean of hemoglobin (9.79 ± 1.49), and BMI range from 14 – 45 with a mean of (27.33 ± 6.59). When analyzing the questionnaires pregnant women divided into two group. Group 1 (171) those women who consumes healthy diet (eight questions answered yes) and Group 2 only 16 pregnant women out 187 (8.56%) consumes a poor diet. (25.7%) had hemoglobin was less than 9mg/dL. The group the poor diet had more small baby which was statistically significant with P < 0.026. Comparing the two groups the fetal complication were statistically significant higher in the poor diet group, with a p value < 0.004 with OD ratio 95% confidence limit 7.318 (2.128-25.166). The level of hemoglobin were less than 10 mg/dL 0.280 (0.087 - 0.902) P < 0.022. The MBI less than 25 with ODs ratio and 95% cl 0.364 (0.121 - 1.092) and p < 0.54. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi pregnant women only 8.56%, and 25.7% their hemoglobin were less than 9gm/dL and their BMI were 27. 33. Poor diet affect only the level of hemoglobin and fetal weight at delivery.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Abdullah K. Agabawi

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Maryam H. Habib

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Sondos Alturkistani

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Bashair Azhari

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar, Abdullah K. Agabawi, Maryam H. Habib, Sondos Alturkistani, Bashair Azhari. (2017). Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 6(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar; Abdullah K. Agabawi; Maryam H. Habib; Sondos Alturkistani; Bashair Azhari. Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 6(1), 25-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar, Abdullah K. Agabawi, Maryam H. Habib, Sondos Alturkistani, Bashair Azhari. Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2017;6(1):25-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15,
  author = {Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar and Abdullah K. Agabawi and Maryam H. Habib and Sondos Alturkistani and Bashair Azhari},
  title = {Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {25-30},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20170601.15},
  abstract = {The Objective of the study Is to assess the nutrition during pregnancy in Saudi women. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to collect, describe and analyze the nutritional status during pregnancy, performed on pregnant women.(May 2016 - July 2016). (210) patients selected from the antenatal clinic KAUH. Inclusion criteria include pregnant women, not in a special diet, and willing to participate. The ethics committee of KAU approved the study. Data collected using a Questionnaire (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed and validated in English language. The questionnaire proposed, used as an indicator of a healthy nutritional diet. Which include eight questions. Results; The total number questionnaires (187) were ready for analysis the positive response rate was only (89.1%). The mean ± stander deviation of age (28.79 ± 5.418), Gravidity (2.98 ± 2.180), Gestational Age (29.42 ± 7.920). The mean of hemoglobin (9.79 ± 1.49), and BMI range from 14 – 45 with a mean of (27.33 ± 6.59). When analyzing the questionnaires pregnant women divided into two group. Group 1 (171) those women who consumes healthy diet (eight questions answered yes) and Group 2 only 16 pregnant women out 187 (8.56%) consumes a poor diet. (25.7%) had hemoglobin was less than 9mg/dL. The group the poor diet had more small baby which was statistically significant with P < 0.026. Comparing the two groups the fetal complication were statistically significant higher in the poor diet group, with a p value < 0.004 with OD ratio 95% confidence limit 7.318 (2.128-25.166). The level of hemoglobin were less than 10 mg/dL 0.280 (0.087 - 0.902) P < 0.022. The MBI less than 25 with ODs ratio and 95% cl 0.364 (0.121 - 1.092) and p < 0.54. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi pregnant women only 8.56%, and 25.7% their hemoglobin were less than 9gm/dL and their BMI were 27. 33. Poor diet affect only the level of hemoglobin and fetal weight at delivery.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of the Nutrition and Dietary Status During Pregnancy
AU  - Hassan S. O. Abduljabbar
AU  - Abdullah K. Agabawi
AU  - Maryam H. Habib
AU  - Sondos Alturkistani
AU  - Bashair Azhari
Y1  - 2017/01/18
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 25
EP  - 30
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20170601.15
AB  - The Objective of the study Is to assess the nutrition during pregnancy in Saudi women. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted to collect, describe and analyze the nutritional status during pregnancy, performed on pregnant women.(May 2016 - July 2016). (210) patients selected from the antenatal clinic KAUH. Inclusion criteria include pregnant women, not in a special diet, and willing to participate. The ethics committee of KAU approved the study. Data collected using a Questionnaire (Food Frequency Questionnaire) developed and validated in English language. The questionnaire proposed, used as an indicator of a healthy nutritional diet. Which include eight questions. Results; The total number questionnaires (187) were ready for analysis the positive response rate was only (89.1%). The mean ± stander deviation of age (28.79 ± 5.418), Gravidity (2.98 ± 2.180), Gestational Age (29.42 ± 7.920). The mean of hemoglobin (9.79 ± 1.49), and BMI range from 14 – 45 with a mean of (27.33 ± 6.59). When analyzing the questionnaires pregnant women divided into two group. Group 1 (171) those women who consumes healthy diet (eight questions answered yes) and Group 2 only 16 pregnant women out 187 (8.56%) consumes a poor diet. (25.7%) had hemoglobin was less than 9mg/dL. The group the poor diet had more small baby which was statistically significant with P < 0.026. Comparing the two groups the fetal complication were statistically significant higher in the poor diet group, with a p value < 0.004 with OD ratio 95% confidence limit 7.318 (2.128-25.166). The level of hemoglobin were less than 10 mg/dL 0.280 (0.087 - 0.902) P < 0.022. The MBI less than 25 with ODs ratio and 95% cl 0.364 (0.121 - 1.092) and p < 0.54. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi pregnant women only 8.56%, and 25.7% their hemoglobin were less than 9gm/dL and their BMI were 27. 33. Poor diet affect only the level of hemoglobin and fetal weight at delivery.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download