@article{10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15,
  author = {Ayorinde Ayotunde and Adelabu Michael and Muhammed Hisham and Okewole Francis and Mowete Ike},
  title = {On Some Properties of the Quasi-Moment-Method Pathloss Model Calibration},
  journal = {Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {4},
  pages = {129-146},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeee.20210904.15},
  abstract = {Certain properties of the recently introduced Quasi-Moment-Method (QMM) for the calibration of basic radiowave propagation pathloss models are systematically examined in this paper. Using measurement data concerning three different routes located in a smart campus environment and made available in the open literature, the paper, in particular, investigates the effects of size of pathloss measurement data on the outcomes of the QMM calibration of nine basic pathloss models: namely, COST 231-urban and sub-urban cities models, ECC33-large and medium sized cities models, and the Egli, Ericsson, Hata, Lee, and SUI-‘Terrain A’ models. Computational results reveal that for the data sizes considered, and in the cases of the basic COST 231 and Hata models, which share identical correction factors for receiver antenna height, the ‘model calibration matrix’ becomes ill-conditioned for one choice of basis functions. The corresponding calibrated models, however, still predict pathloss with accuracy typical of the QMM. For example, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) outcomes of predictions due to the calibration of these models, emerged as approximately the same for these three models; with values of 6.03 dB (Route A), 7.96 dB (Route B), and 6.19 dB (Route C). The results also show that when model calibration utilizes measurement data for distances further away from the transmitters (by ignoring measurement data for radial distances less than 100m away from the transmitters) significant improvements in RMSE metrics were recorded. The paper, in terms of the eigenvalues of the model calibration matrices, further examined the responses of these models to calibration with large-sized measurement data, to find that the model calibration matrices remained characterized, in each case, by a distinctly dominant eigenvalue. An important conclusion arising from the results of the investigations is that whereas the QMM model calibration process may lead, in some cases, and when large-sized measurement data is involved, to ‘badly-scaled’ model calibration matrices, the calibrated models still record very good assessment metrics. Computational results also reveal that with large-sized data sets, QMM models yield pathloss predictions with excellent (close to 0 dB) mean prediction errors.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On Some Properties of the Quasi-Moment-Method Pathloss Model Calibration
AU  - Ayorinde Ayotunde
AU  - Adelabu Michael
AU  - Muhammed Hisham
AU  - Okewole Francis
AU  - Mowete Ike
Y1  - 2021/08/07
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15
T2  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JF  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JO  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SP  - 129
EP  - 146
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-1605
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20210904.15
AB  - Certain properties of the recently introduced Quasi-Moment-Method (QMM) for the calibration of basic radiowave propagation pathloss models are systematically examined in this paper. Using measurement data concerning three different routes located in a smart campus environment and made available in the open literature, the paper, in particular, investigates the effects of size of pathloss measurement data on the outcomes of the QMM calibration of nine basic pathloss models: namely, COST 231-urban and sub-urban cities models, ECC33-large and medium sized cities models, and the Egli, Ericsson, Hata, Lee, and SUI-‘Terrain A’ models. Computational results reveal that for the data sizes considered, and in the cases of the basic COST 231 and Hata models, which share identical correction factors for receiver antenna height, the ‘model calibration matrix’ becomes ill-conditioned for one choice of basis functions. The corresponding calibrated models, however, still predict pathloss with accuracy typical of the QMM. For example, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) outcomes of predictions due to the calibration of these models, emerged as approximately the same for these three models; with values of 6.03 dB (Route A), 7.96 dB (Route B), and 6.19 dB (Route C). The results also show that when model calibration utilizes measurement data for distances further away from the transmitters (by ignoring measurement data for radial distances less than 100m away from the transmitters) significant improvements in RMSE metrics were recorded. The paper, in terms of the eigenvalues of the model calibration matrices, further examined the responses of these models to calibration with large-sized measurement data, to find that the model calibration matrices remained characterized, in each case, by a distinctly dominant eigenvalue. An important conclusion arising from the results of the investigations is that whereas the QMM model calibration process may lead, in some cases, and when large-sized measurement data is involved, to ‘badly-scaled’ model calibration matrices, the calibrated models still record very good assessment metrics. Computational results also reveal that with large-sized data sets, QMM models yield pathloss predictions with excellent (close to 0 dB) mean prediction errors.
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
ER  - 

Copy | Download