The right to information is a fundamental right for women, who are vulnerable during the perimaternity period. This study aimed to assess and appraise women’s perceptions of their right to information and the practices of medical teams of maternity wards regarding this matter. This cross-sectional study was carried out for 3 months in the first University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. The female patients included in the study attended this maternity hospital for antenatal care or childbirth. The data collected were analysed and processed with SPSS V.25 software. Three hundred female patients were recruited within the framework of the study. Their mean age was 28±5 years. Most of the respondents were educated (78.4%) and considered that access to information was a right vested to them (68.3%). There was a statistically significant association between that perception and patients’ educational levels or status. A large proportion of patients (88%) were satisfied with how information was delivered to them. Information related to diagnoses, paraclinical examinations and drug treatments was spontaneously transmitted in 37.7%, 55.6% and 27.7% of cases, respectively. Only 23.7% of the women who gave birth were provided information about the vaccines administered to their child at birth. Our findings provide evidence that maternity hospital users are aware of their right to their information. However, the medical team does not incorporate all the components of this right.
| Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15 |
| Page(s) | 212-216 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Medical Ethics, Information for Patients, Informed Consent, Obstetrical Care, Human Right, Medial Responsibility
| [1] | Waddington L, McSherry B. Exceptions and Exclusions: The Right to Informed Consent for Medical Treatment of People with Psychosocial Disabilities in Europe. Eur J Health Law 2016; 23 (3): 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341389 |
| [2] | Debarre J-M. Consentement à l’acte medical en droit. un état des lieux [Consent to medical care in law. An overview] Médecine et Droit 2017; (144): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddro.2017.03.001 |
| [3] | Laude A. Le droit à l’information du malade [The patient right to information. Trib Santé 2005; 9 (4): 43-51. |
| [4] | Burton-Jeangros C, Hammer R. Information seeking on the internet: what information are pregnant women seeking? Rev Med Suisse 2013; 9 (383): 895-7. |
| [5] | Mistretta P. Droit pénal médical. [Medical penal law] Rev Sci Criminelle Droit Pénal Comparé 2015; 2 (2): 411-23. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsc.1502.0411. |
| [6] | Houngnihin RA, Sossou AJ. Understanding failure of obstetric referral to the Cotonou University gynecology and obstetrics clinic. Santé Publique 2017; 29 (5): 719. Doi: 10.3917/spub.175.0719. |
| [7] | Okunade K, Okunola H, Oyeneyin L, Habeeb-Adeyemi F. Cross-sectional study on the obstetric performance of primigravidae in a teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Med J 2016; 57 (5): 303. DOI: 10.4103/0300-1652.190595. |
| [8] | Mongbo V, Ouendo E-M, De Brouwere V, Alexander S, Dujardin B, Makoutodé M, et al. Quality of ceasarean delivery: A cross-sectional study in 12 hospitals in Benin. Rev DÉpidémiologie Santé Publique 2016; 64 (4): 281-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2016.02.009 |
| [9] | Botti K, Ebouat K, Djodjo M, Konate Z, Djodiro G, Yapo Ette H. Study of patients relatives expectations about informations delivered by physician in Cote d’Ivoire. J Med Leg Droit Méd Vict Dommage Corpor 2017; 2 (2): 19-24. |
| [10] | Chima S. « Because I want to be informed, to be part of the decision-making »: Patients’ insights on informed consent practices by healthcare professionals in South Africa. Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18 (7): 46. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.170833. |
| [11] | Mhlongo SW, Mdingi GV. Informed consent is light years away for black African patients. BMJ 1997; 315: 252. |
| [12] | Zagaja A, Patryn R, Pawlikowski J, Sak J. Informed Consent in Obligatory Vaccinations? Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res 2018; 24: 8506-9. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910393. |
| [13] | Reiss DR, Karako-Eyal N. Informed Consent to Vaccination: Theoretical, Legal, and Empirical Insights. Am J Law Med. 2019; 45 (4): 357-419. doi: 14.1177/0098858819892745. PMID: 31973669. |
| [14] | Benin, Présidence de la République. Ordonnance 73-14 du 08/02/1973 Instituant un code de déontologie médicale. 1973; https://sgg.gouv.bj/doc/ordonnance-1973-14/ |
| [15] | Assemblée Nationale du Bénin. loi N 2003-04 du 3 mars 2003 relative à la santé sexuelle et à la reproduction. 2003. https://sgg.gouv.bj/doc/loi-2003-04/ |
| [16] | Alomar AZ. Confidence level, challenges, and obstacles faced by orthopedic residents in obtaining informed consent. J Orthop Surg. 2021; 16 (1): 390. |
| [17] | Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, et al. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2020; 40: 119–143. |
| [18] | Lin Y-K, Liu K-T, Chen C-W, et al. How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20: 8. |
APA Style
Cedric Egnonwa Bigot, Angele Azon Kouanou, Narcisse Vigan, Patrice Dangbemey, Kouessi Anthelme Agbodande, et al. (2021). The Right to Information: An Assessment of Patients’ Perceptions and Satisfaction in a University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9(6), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15
ACS Style
Cedric Egnonwa Bigot; Angele Azon Kouanou; Narcisse Vigan; Patrice Dangbemey; Kouessi Anthelme Agbodande, et al. The Right to Information: An Assessment of Patients’ Perceptions and Satisfaction in a University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 9(6), 212-216. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15
AMA Style
Cedric Egnonwa Bigot, Angele Azon Kouanou, Narcisse Vigan, Patrice Dangbemey, Kouessi Anthelme Agbodande, et al. The Right to Information: An Assessment of Patients’ Perceptions and Satisfaction in a University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;9(6):212-216. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15,
author = {Cedric Egnonwa Bigot and Angele Azon Kouanou and Narcisse Vigan and Patrice Dangbemey and Kouessi Anthelme Agbodande and Christiane Tshabu Aguemon},
title = {The Right to Information: An Assessment of Patients’ Perceptions and Satisfaction in a University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou},
journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {212-216},
doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20210906.15},
abstract = {The right to information is a fundamental right for women, who are vulnerable during the perimaternity period. This study aimed to assess and appraise women’s perceptions of their right to information and the practices of medical teams of maternity wards regarding this matter. This cross-sectional study was carried out for 3 months in the first University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. The female patients included in the study attended this maternity hospital for antenatal care or childbirth. The data collected were analysed and processed with SPSS V.25 software. Three hundred female patients were recruited within the framework of the study. Their mean age was 28±5 years. Most of the respondents were educated (78.4%) and considered that access to information was a right vested to them (68.3%). There was a statistically significant association between that perception and patients’ educational levels or status. A large proportion of patients (88%) were satisfied with how information was delivered to them. Information related to diagnoses, paraclinical examinations and drug treatments was spontaneously transmitted in 37.7%, 55.6% and 27.7% of cases, respectively. Only 23.7% of the women who gave birth were provided information about the vaccines administered to their child at birth. Our findings provide evidence that maternity hospital users are aware of their right to their information. However, the medical team does not incorporate all the components of this right.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Right to Information: An Assessment of Patients’ Perceptions and Satisfaction in a University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou AU - Cedric Egnonwa Bigot AU - Angele Azon Kouanou AU - Narcisse Vigan AU - Patrice Dangbemey AU - Kouessi Anthelme Agbodande AU - Christiane Tshabu Aguemon Y1 - 2021/11/17 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 212 EP - 216 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20210906.15 AB - The right to information is a fundamental right for women, who are vulnerable during the perimaternity period. This study aimed to assess and appraise women’s perceptions of their right to information and the practices of medical teams of maternity wards regarding this matter. This cross-sectional study was carried out for 3 months in the first University Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Cotonou. The female patients included in the study attended this maternity hospital for antenatal care or childbirth. The data collected were analysed and processed with SPSS V.25 software. Three hundred female patients were recruited within the framework of the study. Their mean age was 28±5 years. Most of the respondents were educated (78.4%) and considered that access to information was a right vested to them (68.3%). There was a statistically significant association between that perception and patients’ educational levels or status. A large proportion of patients (88%) were satisfied with how information was delivered to them. Information related to diagnoses, paraclinical examinations and drug treatments was spontaneously transmitted in 37.7%, 55.6% and 27.7% of cases, respectively. Only 23.7% of the women who gave birth were provided information about the vaccines administered to their child at birth. Our findings provide evidence that maternity hospital users are aware of their right to their information. However, the medical team does not incorporate all the components of this right. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: