Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali

Received: 27 September 2025     Accepted: 7 October 2025     Published: 30 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

While electrification and access to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are increasing in Kigali, daily meals continue to rely on charcoal and wood. This study investigates why the adoption of new connections and appliance ownership does not necessarily result in appropriation, defined as the enduring and legitimate integration of equipment into valued culinary routines. Employing narrative ethnography in Gasabo, Kicukiro, and Nyarugenge from January to July 2025, we integrated semi-structured interviews, participant observation in over 100 cooking sessions, small focus groups, and transect walks. We analysed job timing, fuel sequencing, metering protocols, artefact custody, and vendor-trust practices that influence regular decision-making. Research reveals "sequenced appropriation": a rapid initiation followed by completion in which high-temperature methods (LPG/electricity) transition to charcoal for enhanced flavour, texture, and reputational security, locally referred to as ibishyimbo zibuka amakara ("beans remember charcoal"). Access to modern heating is governed by gatekeeping mechanisms (prepaid meters, top-up SIM cards, regulator keys) and trust frameworks (visible weighing, seal inspections, regulator-date logs). It is additionally influenced by hospitality risk and seasonal fluctuations in reliability. Prepayment visibility creates a "metered morality" that increases the social cost of mid-cook failures and restricts experimentation with unfamiliar equipment; space compatibility and delicate gadget ecologies further hinder domestication. The investigation elucidates the adoption of charcoal finishes without substitution and delineates gendered legitimacy dynamics that categorise charcoal finishes as "guest-facing" precautions, while designating swift transitions to LPG/electricity. We offer indicators at the appropriation level, detailing who utilises resources, for which tasks, at what times, and under whose authority, alongside ownership counts, to ensure that transitions are auditable at the practical level. The findings inform design and policy alternatives that normalise hybrids, establish vendor transparency, enhance repair routes, and regulate usage (e.g., hosting modes, co-registered SIMs), thereby transitioning high-heat phases away from biomass without compromising sensory legitimacy.

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20
Page(s) 569-578
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Gender, Clean Cooking, Sequenced Appropriation, Gatekeeping Artefacts, Innovation Uptake

References
[1] African Union & Africa Energy Commission (AFREC). (2022). Rwanda Energy Profile. African Union - Africa Energy Commission.
[2] Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
[3] Bowden, S., & Offer, A. (1994). Household appliances and the use of time: The United States and Britain since the 1920s. The Economic History Review, 47(4), 725-748.
[4] Bouzarovski, S. (2022). Energy and labour: Thinking across the continuum. Progress in Human Geography, 46(3), 753-774.
[5] Call, D. R., & Herber, D. R. (2022). Applicability of the diffusion of innovation theory to accelerate model-based systems engineering adoption. Systems Engineering, 25(6), 574-583.
[6] Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
[7] Dearing, J. W. (2008). Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 99-108.
[8] Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503-518.
[9] Flechtner, S., Lich, U., & Pelz, S. (2024). Women’s decision-making power, cooking fuel adoption and appliance ownership: Evidence from Rwanda, Nepal and Honduras. Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103780.
[10] Gaspari, J., Antonini, E., Marchi, L., & Vodola, V. (2021). Energy transition at home: A survey on the data and practices that lead to a change in household energy behavior. Sustainability, 13(9), 5268.
[11] Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
[12] Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
[13] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2011). World Energy Outlook 2011. IEA.
[14] Jagger, P., Das, I., Handa, S., Nylander-French, L. A., & Yeatts, K. B. (2019). Early adoption of an improved household energy system in urban Rwanda. EcoHealth, 16(1), 7-20.
[15] Jeuland, M. (2018). Designing and evaluating behavior change interventions to improve the adoption and use of improved cookstoves. AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.
[16] MacVaugh, J., & Schiavone, F. (2010). Limits to the diffusion of innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 197-221.
[17] Malla, S., & Timilsina, G. R. (2014). Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries: A review (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6903). World Bank.
[18] Masera, O. R., Saatkamp, B. D., & Kammen, D. M. (2000). From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: A critique and alternative to the energy ladder model. World Development, 28(12), 2083-2103.
[19] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
[20] Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press.
[21] Puzzolo, E., Zerriffi, H., Carter, E., Clemens, H., Stokes, H., Jagger, P., Rosenthal, J., & Petach, H. (2019). Supply considerations for scaling up clean cooking fuels for household energy in low- and middle-income countries. GeoHealth, 3(12), 370-390.
[22] Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584-603.
[23] Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2014). What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 41-58.
[24] Troncoso, K., Castillo, A., Masera, O., & Merino, L. (2007). Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: Case study in rural Mexico. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2799-2810.
[25] Vemireddy, V., & Pingali, P. L. (2021). Seasonal time trade-offs and nutrition outcomes for women in agriculture: Evidence from rural India. Food Policy, 101, 102074.
[26] Vigolo, V., Sallaku, R., & Testa, F. (2018). Drivers and barriers to clean cooking: A systematic literature review from a consumer behavior perspective. Sustainability, 10(11), 4322.
[27] Vulturius, G., & Wanjiru, H. (2017). The role of social relations in the adoption of improved cookstoves (Stockholm Environment Institute Working Paper No. 2017-01). Stockholm Environment Institute.
[28] Winther, T., Ulsrud, K., Matinga, M., Govindan, M., Gill, B., Saini, A., Brahmachari, D., Palit, D., & Murali, R. (2020). In the light of what we cannot see: Exploring the interconnections between gender and electricity access. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101334.
[29] World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). Opportunities for transition to clean household energy in Rwanda. WHO.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Thoronka, J. (2025). Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali. Social Sciences, 14(5), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Thoronka, J. Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(5), 569-578. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Thoronka J. Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali. Soc Sci. 2025;14(5):569-578. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20,
      author = {Jeremiah Thoronka},
      title = {Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali
    },
      journal = {Social Sciences},
      volume = {14},
      number = {5},
      pages = {569-578},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20251405.20},
      abstract = {While electrification and access to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are increasing in Kigali, daily meals continue to rely on charcoal and wood. This study investigates why the adoption of new connections and appliance ownership does not necessarily result in appropriation, defined as the enduring and legitimate integration of equipment into valued culinary routines. Employing narrative ethnography in Gasabo, Kicukiro, and Nyarugenge from January to July 2025, we integrated semi-structured interviews, participant observation in over 100 cooking sessions, small focus groups, and transect walks. We analysed job timing, fuel sequencing, metering protocols, artefact custody, and vendor-trust practices that influence regular decision-making. Research reveals "sequenced appropriation": a rapid initiation followed by completion in which high-temperature methods (LPG/electricity) transition to charcoal for enhanced flavour, texture, and reputational security, locally referred to as ibishyimbo zibuka amakara ("beans remember charcoal"). Access to modern heating is governed by gatekeeping mechanisms (prepaid meters, top-up SIM cards, regulator keys) and trust frameworks (visible weighing, seal inspections, regulator-date logs). It is additionally influenced by hospitality risk and seasonal fluctuations in reliability. Prepayment visibility creates a "metered morality" that increases the social cost of mid-cook failures and restricts experimentation with unfamiliar equipment; space compatibility and delicate gadget ecologies further hinder domestication. The investigation elucidates the adoption of charcoal finishes without substitution and delineates gendered legitimacy dynamics that categorise charcoal finishes as "guest-facing" precautions, while designating swift transitions to LPG/electricity. We offer indicators at the appropriation level, detailing who utilises resources, for which tasks, at what times, and under whose authority, alongside ownership counts, to ensure that transitions are auditable at the practical level. The findings inform design and policy alternatives that normalise hybrids, establish vendor transparency, enhance repair routes, and regulate usage (e.g., hosting modes, co-registered SIMs), thereby transitioning high-heat phases away from biomass without compromising sensory legitimacy.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Sequenced Appropriation: Gendered Cooking Practice and Clean-Cooking Transitions in Urban Kigali
    
    AU  - Jeremiah Thoronka
    Y1  - 2025/10/30
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20
    T2  - Social Sciences
    JF  - Social Sciences
    JO  - Social Sciences
    SP  - 569
    EP  - 578
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-988X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251405.20
    AB  - While electrification and access to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are increasing in Kigali, daily meals continue to rely on charcoal and wood. This study investigates why the adoption of new connections and appliance ownership does not necessarily result in appropriation, defined as the enduring and legitimate integration of equipment into valued culinary routines. Employing narrative ethnography in Gasabo, Kicukiro, and Nyarugenge from January to July 2025, we integrated semi-structured interviews, participant observation in over 100 cooking sessions, small focus groups, and transect walks. We analysed job timing, fuel sequencing, metering protocols, artefact custody, and vendor-trust practices that influence regular decision-making. Research reveals "sequenced appropriation": a rapid initiation followed by completion in which high-temperature methods (LPG/electricity) transition to charcoal for enhanced flavour, texture, and reputational security, locally referred to as ibishyimbo zibuka amakara ("beans remember charcoal"). Access to modern heating is governed by gatekeeping mechanisms (prepaid meters, top-up SIM cards, regulator keys) and trust frameworks (visible weighing, seal inspections, regulator-date logs). It is additionally influenced by hospitality risk and seasonal fluctuations in reliability. Prepayment visibility creates a "metered morality" that increases the social cost of mid-cook failures and restricts experimentation with unfamiliar equipment; space compatibility and delicate gadget ecologies further hinder domestication. The investigation elucidates the adoption of charcoal finishes without substitution and delineates gendered legitimacy dynamics that categorise charcoal finishes as "guest-facing" precautions, while designating swift transitions to LPG/electricity. We offer indicators at the appropriation level, detailing who utilises resources, for which tasks, at what times, and under whose authority, alongside ownership counts, to ensure that transitions are auditable at the practical level. The findings inform design and policy alternatives that normalise hybrids, establish vendor transparency, enhance repair routes, and regulate usage (e.g., hosting modes, co-registered SIMs), thereby transitioning high-heat phases away from biomass without compromising sensory legitimacy.
    
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections