Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program

Christian Ilcus

doi:doi:10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program

Christian Ilcus^*

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 11, Issue 1)

Received: 14 August 2025 Accepted: 20 October 2025 Published: 30 January 2026

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This research examines the transformation of Brussels as the political capital of the European Union, analyzing the intricate interplay between spatial production, strategic planning, and governance. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates theoretical dimensions of urban transformation to provide a holistic understanding of how political authority is inscribed into urban space. The study poses key research questions including: What challenges does Brussels face in its transformation into the definitive capital of Europe? How does community engagement shape urban planning processes and cultural vibrancy? What role do sustainable architectural innovations play in enhancing the city's identity and livability? The findings underscore that Brussels' urban development embodies a complex negotiation of local and supranational interests, where strategic initiatives have fostered both socio-cultural integration and ecological sustainability. Notably, the research reveals that key projects serve not just functional purposes but also act as instruments of symbolic representation, reinforcing Brussels' identity as a global political hub. Overall, the study concludes that addressing sustainability, inclusivity, and cultural vibrancy is crucial for solidifying Brussels' role as a dynamic center of European governance. Furthermore, it highlights the need for an integrated analytical framework that combines spatial, governance, and symbolic dimensions, thus providing actionable insights for policymakers and urban planners not only in Brussels but also in similarly positioned cities worldwide. The recommendations provided are intended to guide policymakers and urban planners in creating a more inclusive, dynamic urban environment that reflects both local identity and global significance.

Published in	Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 11, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
Page(s)	21-60
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Brussels-capital Region, Metropolitan Governance, European Union Institutions, International City, Urban Diversity, Multicultural Population, Global City Functions, Political-administrative Hub

References

[1]	Baclija Brajnik, I. Depoliticisation and governance in large municipalities: Power behind the formal structures. Brussels: Urban Policy Press, 2024.
[2]	Beaufays, J. (1988). Belgium: A dualist political system?, 1998.
[3]	Bisciari, P., & El Joueidi, S. Is Bruxelles a performing, competitive and attractive region? NNB Economic Review. 2022.
[4]	Blue Ocean Traditionally Smoked Fish, https://www.blueocean-seafood.be/home-2
[5]	Bradford, A. Global regulatory cities: Brussels as a site of European authority. London: Routledge, 2020.
[6]	Commissioner Brussels. Urban redevelopment and policy initiatives in the European Quarter: Annual report. Brussels: European Urban Affairs Office, 2025.
[7]	Corijn, E., & Vloeberghs, W. “The Brussels Capital of Europe: Planning the European Quarter.” European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(3), 261–274, 2009.
[8]	Dawson, B. Science and the scientific disciplines. In P. Hamilton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of European Romanticism (online edn). Oxford Academic. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696383.013.35
[9]	De Frantz, L. Collaborative planning and transnational governance in Brussels. Journal of Urban Policy and Governance, 15(2), 87–105, 2022.
[10]	Denoo, S. Post-war urban planning under uncertainty: Iterations in Brussels’ spatial production. Urban Studies Review, 46(3), 345–362, 2019.
[11]	Eurocities Pulse – Mayors Survey, 2025, https://monitor.eurocities.eu/eurocities-pulse-mayors-survey/
[12]	European Commission, JRC. The future of cities: Opportunities, challenges and the way forward. 2019 https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a55c1af0-8e52-11e9-9369-01aa75ed71a1
[13]	Gompel, J. van, & Vandamme, C. Brussels is middle of the pack in comparison to European cities. KBC. 2023 https://www.kbc.com/en/economics/publications/brussels-is-middle-of-the-pack-in-comparison-to-european-cities.html
[14]	Harvey, D. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17, 1989.
[15]	Healey, P. Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe. London: UCL Press, 1997.
[16]	Healey, P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
[17]	Hooghe, L. Belgium: From regionalism to federalism, 2003.
[18]	Hutter, M. Experiencing Cities (3rd ed.). Routledge. 2016.
[19]	Ilcus, Christian “BRUXELLES - Building Program for the Political Capital of Europe”, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4968305
[20]	Lefebvre, H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
[21]	Mahgoub, Y., Cavalagli, N., Versaci, A., Bougdah, H., & Serra Permanyer, M. Cities' identity through architecture and arts. Springer. 2021.
[22]	Maulidi, R. Technological disruption and urban spatial reconfiguration in Brussels. European Planning Journal, 28(1), 54–72, 2023.
[23]	Mikelsone, L. Sustainability, economic development, and urban transformation: Balancing function and symbolism in Brussels. Journal of Urban Development, 12(4), 211–229, 2021.
[24]	Moreno, Carlos The 15-minute city: A solution for Saving Our Planet, 2024.
[25]	Mähki, U. Philosophy of interdisciplinarity: What? Why? How? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6, 327–342. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0162-0
[26]	Pijoan, M. Urban spaces as instruments of political legitimacy: Symbolism in Brussels’ European Quarter. European Urban Studies, 33(1), 99–120, 2025.
[27]	Port of Brussels, https://port.brussels/en
[28]	Romainville, C. (2015). Dynamics of Belgian plurinational federalism, 2015.
[29]	Romańczyk, P. Neighbourhood contracts and urban redevelopment in Brussels: Socio-spatial dynamics of coordinated construction. Brussels: Central European Urban Press, 2015.
[30]	Sassen, S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
[31]	Simms, Brendan Europe: The Struggle for Supremacy, from 1453 to the Present, Basic Books, 2013.
[32]	Sinnett, D., Smith, N., & Burgess, S. Handbook on green infrastructure planning, design and implementation. University of the West of England, UK. 2015.
[33]	Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode, 34(3), 542–577, 2002.
[34]	Trobbiani, F. Functional interest representation in European regions: Negotiating authority in Brussels. Regional Governance Review, 9(2), 65–83, 2015.
[35]	Van Wynsberghe, C. The Making of the European Capital. Brussels: ASP Editions, 2013.
[36]	Vandenberghe, M. (2023). Power-sharing and the paradox of federalism: Federalization and the evolution of ethno-territorial conflict in the case of Belgium (1979–2018). Ethnopolitics, 22(5), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2045828
[37]	van de Werfhorst, H. G. Cultural capital: Strengths, weaknesses and two advancements. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 157–169. 2010 https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690903539065
[38]	Wadhwa, S., & Sharp, J. (2020). Building a robust capacity framework for U.S. city diplomacy. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/publication/building-robust-capacity-framework-us-city-diplomacy
[39]	Eurocities. (2022). How city diplomacy is shaping EU and global policy. Eurocities. https://eurocities.eu/latest/how-city-diplomacy-is-shaping-eu-and-global-policy/
[40]	Thunis, P., Pisoni, E., Zauli Sajani, S., Monforti?Ferrario, F., Bessagnet, B., Vignati, E., & de Meij, A. (2023). Urban PM2.5 Atlas: Air Quality in European Cities (EUR 31679 EN; JRC134950). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/63641 (JRC Publications).
[41]	Bosch Checa, C., Coll Aliaga, E., Correcher Rigau, M., De la Torre Fornés, P., Guardiola Ibañez, N., Jiménez García, C., … Perpiña Castillo, C. (2023, December 15). Extended Progress Report on the Valencia CityLab during 2023 (JRC138853). Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC138853 (JRC Publications).
[42]	Simpson, C., Bonjean, I., Fornara, M., Jonkers, K., Klaassen, T., Lehto, S., … Westra van Holthe, M. (2024, April 16). JRC Highlights Report 2023 (JRC136884). Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC136884 (JRC Publications).
[43]	Brupartners. (2023). Stratégie Go4Brussels 2030. https://www.brupartners.brussels/sites/default/files/uploads/s2030bis_fr_0.pdf
[44]	Cambridge University Press. (2020). Land and soil policy in urban governance. Cambridge University Press. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/F1EDDDECD83C6DDFF249E5BBBB12987D/9781108627146c15_p372-397_CBO.pdf/land_and_soil_policy.pdf?
[45]	Citego. (2021). Multi-stakeholder governance for sustainable cities. https://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-1252_fr.html?
[46]	Dijkstra, L., & Lewis, N. (2021). Urban diplomacy and multi-level governance in European cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(7), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1801234
[47]	E-IR. (2022, May 15). City diplomacy: The case for eclectic and humble theorizing. https://www.e-ir.info/2022/05/15/city-diplomacy-the-case-for-eclectic-and-humble-theorizing/?
[48]	Marchetti, R. (2019). City diplomacy. University of Michigan Press. https://press.umich.edu/Books/C/City-Diplomacy2
[49]	Redalyc. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in urban diplomacy. Redalyc Journal of Urban Policy, 19(3), 45–62. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/198/19860787003/?
[50]	Springer, A. (2024). City diplomacy as soft power: Leveraging urban assets for global influence. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 20(1), 23–38. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41254-024-00342-9?
[51]	Sudjic, Deyan The Language of Cities, Penguin Books, 2016.
[52]	Murayama, Y., Kamusoko, C., Yamashita, A., & Estoque, R. C. (Eds.). (2017). Urban Development in Asia and Africa: Geospatial Analysis of Metropolises. Springer Singapore. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-3241-7
[53]	Sorensen, A., & Okata, J. (Eds.). (2010). Megacities: Urban Form, Governance, and Sustainability. Springer Tokyo. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-4-431-99267-7
[54]	Kraas, F., Aggarwal, S., Coy, M., & Mertins, G. (Eds.). (2014). Megacities: Our Global Urban Future. Springer Dordrecht. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-3417-5
[55]	Singh, R. B. (Ed.). (2015). Urban Development Challenges, Risks and Resilience in Asian Mega Cities. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-4-431-55043-3
[56]	Neuwirth, R. (2004). Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, A New Urban World. Routledge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Cities_%28book%29
[57]	Mohr, C., Fülling, O., & Barenbrock, B. (2010). Megacities.. https://www.teneues.com/en/book/megacities
[58]	Deden, S., & Rukmana, D. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Megacities in the Global South. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003038160
[59]	Yuen, B. K. P., & Kumssa, A. (Eds.). (2011). Climate Change and Sustainable Urban Development in Africa and Asia. Springer Dordrecht. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-9867-2
[60]	United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). (2025). World Urbanization Prospects 2025: Key facts and figures. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/world-urbanization-prospects-2025
[61]	United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). (2025). World Economic Situation and Prospects 2025. United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP-2025_WEB.pdf
[62]	Camillo Sitte The Art of Building Cities, https://ia601500.us.archive.org/3/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.212097/2015.212097.The-Art.pdf

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ilcus, C. (2026). Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban and Regional Planning, 11(1), 21-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ilcus, C. Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban Reg. Plan. 2026, 11(1), 21-60. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ilcus C. Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban Reg Plan. 2026;11(1):21-60. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13,
  author = {Christian Ilcus},
  title = {Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {11},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-60},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20261101.13},
  abstract = {This research examines the transformation of Brussels as the political capital of the European Union, analyzing the intricate interplay between spatial production, strategic planning, and governance. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates theoretical dimensions of urban transformation to provide a holistic understanding of how political authority is inscribed into urban space. The study poses key research questions including: What challenges does Brussels face in its transformation into the definitive capital of Europe? How does community engagement shape urban planning processes and cultural vibrancy? What role do sustainable architectural innovations play in enhancing the city's identity and livability? The findings underscore that Brussels' urban development embodies a complex negotiation of local and supranational interests, where strategic initiatives have fostered both socio-cultural integration and ecological sustainability. Notably, the research reveals that key projects serve not just functional purposes but also act as instruments of symbolic representation, reinforcing Brussels' identity as a global political hub. Overall, the study concludes that addressing sustainability, inclusivity, and cultural vibrancy is crucial for solidifying Brussels' role as a dynamic center of European governance. Furthermore, it highlights the need for an integrated analytical framework that combines spatial, governance, and symbolic dimensions, thus providing actionable insights for policymakers and urban planners not only in Brussels but also in similarly positioned cities worldwide. The recommendations provided are intended to guide policymakers and urban planners in creating a more inclusive, dynamic urban environment that reflects both local identity and global significance.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program
AU  - Christian Ilcus
Y1  - 2026/01/30
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 21
EP  - 60
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
AB  - This research examines the transformation of Brussels as the political capital of the European Union, analyzing the intricate interplay between spatial production, strategic planning, and governance. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates theoretical dimensions of urban transformation to provide a holistic understanding of how political authority is inscribed into urban space. The study poses key research questions including: What challenges does Brussels face in its transformation into the definitive capital of Europe? How does community engagement shape urban planning processes and cultural vibrancy? What role do sustainable architectural innovations play in enhancing the city's identity and livability? The findings underscore that Brussels' urban development embodies a complex negotiation of local and supranational interests, where strategic initiatives have fostered both socio-cultural integration and ecological sustainability. Notably, the research reveals that key projects serve not just functional purposes but also act as instruments of symbolic representation, reinforcing Brussels' identity as a global political hub. Overall, the study concludes that addressing sustainability, inclusivity, and cultural vibrancy is crucial for solidifying Brussels' role as a dynamic center of European governance. Furthermore, it highlights the need for an integrated analytical framework that combines spatial, governance, and symbolic dimensions, thus providing actionable insights for policymakers and urban planners not only in Brussels but also in similarly positioned cities worldwide. The recommendations provided are intended to guide policymakers and urban planners in creating a more inclusive, dynamic urban environment that reflects both local identity and global significance.
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Christian Ilcus

Gociu Consult, Copenhagen, EU

Contact Email

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ilcus, C. (2026). Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban and Regional Planning, 11(1), 21-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ilcus, C. Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban Reg. Plan. 2026, 11(1), 21-60. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ilcus C. Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program. Urban Reg Plan. 2026;11(1):21-60. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13,
  author = {Christian Ilcus},
  title = {Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program},
  journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
  volume = {11},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-60},
  doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20261101.13},
  abstract = {This research examines the transformation of Brussels as the political capital of the European Union, analyzing the intricate interplay between spatial production, strategic planning, and governance. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates theoretical dimensions of urban transformation to provide a holistic understanding of how political authority is inscribed into urban space. The study poses key research questions including: What challenges does Brussels face in its transformation into the definitive capital of Europe? How does community engagement shape urban planning processes and cultural vibrancy? What role do sustainable architectural innovations play in enhancing the city's identity and livability? The findings underscore that Brussels' urban development embodies a complex negotiation of local and supranational interests, where strategic initiatives have fostered both socio-cultural integration and ecological sustainability. Notably, the research reveals that key projects serve not just functional purposes but also act as instruments of symbolic representation, reinforcing Brussels' identity as a global political hub. Overall, the study concludes that addressing sustainability, inclusivity, and cultural vibrancy is crucial for solidifying Brussels' role as a dynamic center of European governance. Furthermore, it highlights the need for an integrated analytical framework that combines spatial, governance, and symbolic dimensions, thus providing actionable insights for policymakers and urban planners not only in Brussels but also in similarly positioned cities worldwide. The recommendations provided are intended to guide policymakers and urban planners in creating a more inclusive, dynamic urban environment that reflects both local identity and global significance.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Brussels Unveiled: Culture, Community, and Governance - A Building Program
AU  - Christian Ilcus
Y1  - 2026/01/30
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
SP  - 21
EP  - 60
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20261101.13
AB  - This research examines the transformation of Brussels as the political capital of the European Union, analyzing the intricate interplay between spatial production, strategic planning, and governance. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates theoretical dimensions of urban transformation to provide a holistic understanding of how political authority is inscribed into urban space. The study poses key research questions including: What challenges does Brussels face in its transformation into the definitive capital of Europe? How does community engagement shape urban planning processes and cultural vibrancy? What role do sustainable architectural innovations play in enhancing the city's identity and livability? The findings underscore that Brussels' urban development embodies a complex negotiation of local and supranational interests, where strategic initiatives have fostered both socio-cultural integration and ecological sustainability. Notably, the research reveals that key projects serve not just functional purposes but also act as instruments of symbolic representation, reinforcing Brussels' identity as a global political hub. Overall, the study concludes that addressing sustainability, inclusivity, and cultural vibrancy is crucial for solidifying Brussels' role as a dynamic center of European governance. Furthermore, it highlights the need for an integrated analytical framework that combines spatial, governance, and symbolic dimensions, thus providing actionable insights for policymakers and urban planners not only in Brussels but also in similarly positioned cities worldwide. The recommendations provided are intended to guide policymakers and urban planners in creating a more inclusive, dynamic urban environment that reflects both local identity and global significance.
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download